JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Sindicato De Trabajadores De La Industria De Productos Grasos Y Alimenticios, “sintraimagra”

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-727 De 2008. Se Resolvió Denegar La Solicitud De La Referencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Accionante no expuso de manera clara los argumentos en los cuales fundamenta su solicitud ni explicó los parámetros jurídicos tendientes a demostrar el desconocimiento del fallo
  • Notificación por conducta concluyente
  • Inexistencia de razones del cambio de jurisprudencia
Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos para declarar la nulidad
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-727 de 2008
  2. proferida por la Sala Cuarta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  3. Segundo. LIBRENSE por Secretaria General las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceRodrigo Escobar GilConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.